These local symbols are used only in this file.
Fix the following sparse warnings:
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c:7011:1: warning: symbol 'mpt_SoftResetHandler'
was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.c:624:1: warning: symbol 'mptscsih_quiesce_raid'
was not
On 7/30/2013 6:32 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
On Mon, July 29, 2013, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote:
On 7/29/2013 11:47 AM, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
On 7/26/2013 7:15 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
Fatal error in OCS(overall command status) field indicates
error conditions which is not covered by UFSHCI.
It
Hi,
I tested the new set of patches (V5 1-4) and it works.
Thanks,
Dolev
The first patch fixes many issues with current task management handling
in UFSHCD driver. Others improve error handling in various scenarios.
These patches are rebased on:
[PATCH 9/9] drivers/scsi/ufs: don't check
Tested-by: Dolev Raviv dra...@codeaurora.org
There is a possible race condition in the hardware when the abort
command is issued to terminate the ongoing SCSI command as described
below:
- A bit in the door-bell register is set in the controller for a
new SCSI command.
- In some rare
Tested-by: Dolev Raviv dra...@codeaurora.org
Currently, sending Task Management (TM) command to the card might
be broken in some scenarios as listed below:
Problem: If there are more than 8 TM commands the implementation
returns error to the caller.
Fix: Wait for one of the
Tested-by: Dolev Raviv dra...@codeaurora.org
As of now SCSI initiated error handling is broken because,
the reset APIs don't try to bring back the device initialized and
ready for further transfers.
In case of timeouts, the scsi error handler takes care of handling aborts
and resets.
Tested-by: Dolev Raviv dra...@codeaurora.org
Error handling in UFS driver is broken and resets the host controller
for fatal errors without re-initialization. Correct the fatal error
handling sequence according to UFS Host Controller Interface (HCI)
v1.1 specification.
o Processed requests
* John Kacur | 2013-07-26 16:42:30 [+0200]:
Signed-off-by: John Kacur jka...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Stephen scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com
ping.
I checked the branches for-next, scsi-fixes, fixes and misc at [0] and I
didn't see it. I'm going to take this for 3.10-rt but please don't lose
it on its
- Original Message -
* John Kacur | 2013-07-26 16:42:30 [+0200]:
Signed-off-by: John Kacur jka...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Stephen scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com
ping.
I checked the branches for-next, scsi-fixes, fixes and misc at [0] and I
didn't see it. I'm going to take this for
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:33:32AM -0400, John Kacur wrote:
- Original Message -
* John Kacur | 2013-07-26 16:42:30 [+0200]:
Signed-off-by: John Kacur jka...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Stephen scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com
ping.
I checked the branches for-next, scsi-fixes,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 11:07:37AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
You don't have to resubmit, I'll get it reviewed and applied today.
Hi Jens,
I limited the minimal queue depth to 4, which is apparently wrong
in case of libata. I will post a new series.
--
Jens Axboe
--
Regards,
Alexander
On 08/06/2013 04:52 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-08-04 10:19 PM, vaughan wrote:
On 08/03/2013 01:25 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-08-01 01:01 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-07-22 01:03 PM, Jörn Engel wrote:
On Mon, 22 July 2013 12:40:29 +0800, Vaughan Cao wrote:
There is a race
On 13-08-12 10:46 PM, vaughan wrote:
On 08/06/2013 04:52 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-08-04 10:19 PM, vaughan wrote:
On 08/03/2013 01:25 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-08-01 01:01 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-07-22 01:03 PM, Jörn Engel wrote:
On Mon, 22 July 2013 12:40:29 +0800,
13 matches
Mail list logo
