On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 02:34:52PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:10:48AM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 01/22/2014 04:34 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:04:29PM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
One topic that has been lurking forever at the edges is the current
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:13:59AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:02 +, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 09:21 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 17:02 +, Chris Mason wrote:
[ I like big sectors and I cannot lie ]
I think I
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:21:40AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 17:02 +, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 15:19 +, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:58:46AM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 01/22/2014 09:34 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Wed,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:50:02AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:30:19 -0800 James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
But this, I think, is the fundamental point for debate. If we can pull
alignment and other tricks to solve 99% of the problem is
From: Sha Zhengju handai@taobao.com
Signed-off-by: Sha Zhengju handai@taobao.com
---
drivers/scsi/sd.h |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.h b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
index 26895ff..3bbe4df 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
@@ -24,7 +24,6
The version of isci driver has not been updated for 2 years.
It was 83 isci commits ago. Suspend/resume support has been implemented
and many bugs have been fixed since 1.1. Now update the version to 1.2.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Dorau lukasz.do...@intel.com
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
---
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 10:39 AM Lukasz Dorau lukasz.do...@intel.com
wrote:
The version of isci driver has not been updated for 2 years.
It was 83 isci commits ago. Suspend/resume support has been implemented
and many bugs have been fixed since 1.1. Now update the version to 1.2.
The version of isci driver has not been updated for 2 years.
It was 83 isci commits ago. Suspend/resume support has been implemented
and many bugs have been fixed since 1.1. Now update the version to 1.2.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Dorau lukasz.do...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang
Whoaa!!
I recompiled the master again, but now with a little bit modified
configuration, mainly I disabled the CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_CYPRESS_ATACB and
it works like a charm! Disk is properly and immediately detected and works!
I also tried to boot to standard kernel and disable loading ums_cypress
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 07:35:58PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
I expect it would be relatively simple to get large blocksizes working
on powerpc with 64k PAGE_SIZE. So before diving in and doing huge
amounts of work, perhaps someone can do a proof-of-concept on powerpc
(or ia64) with
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 19:27 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:13:59AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:02 +, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 09:21 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 17:02 +, Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 07:47:53AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 19:27 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:13:59AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:02 +, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 09:21 -0800, James
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Milan Svoboda wrote:
Whoaa!!
I recompiled the master again, but now with a little bit modified
configuration, mainly I disabled the CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_CYPRESS_ATACB and
it works like a charm! Disk is properly and immediately detected and works!
I don't see how that
When the controller encounters an error (including QUEUE FULL or BUSY
status), it aborts all not yet submitted requests in the function
sym_dequeue_from_squeue.
This function aborts them with DID_SOFT_ERROR.
If the disk has a full tag queue, the request that caused the overflow is
aborted
On 01/07/2014 12:18 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:53:44PM +0100, Matthias Eble wrote:
I have a persistent reservations for dummies document I wrote that I
can send you off list, if you like.
I think I know how PRs work. Yet I'd be happy about your document.
I
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 07:55:50AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 07:35:58PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
I expect it would be relatively simple to get large blocksizes working
on powerpc with 64k PAGE_SIZE. So before diving in and doing huge
amounts of work,
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 16:44 +, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 07:47:53AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 19:27 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:13:59AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:02 +, Chris Mason
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 04:44:38PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 07:47:53AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 19:27 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:13:59AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:02 +, Chris
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I'm interested in the topic but I severely doubt I'd
have the capacity to research the background of this in advance. It's also
unlikely that I'd work on it in the future without throwing out my current
TODO list. In an ideal world
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
Large block support was proposed years ago by Christoph Lameter
(http://lwn.net/Articles/232757/). I think I was just getting started
in the community at the time so I do not recall any of the details. I do
believe it motivated an alternative by Nick
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, James Bottomley wrote:
If the compound page infrastructure exists today and is usable for this,
what else do we need to do? ... because if it's a couple of trivial
changes and a few minor patches to filesystems to take advantage of it,
we might as well do it anyway. I
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 07:55:50AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 07:35:58PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
I expect it would be relatively simple to get large blocksizes working
on powerpc with 64k PAGE_SIZE. So before diving in and doing huge
amounts of work,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:47:01AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:37 +, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 10:13 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:02 +, Chris Mason wrote:
[agreement cut because it's boring for the reader]
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 13:27 -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:47:01AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:37 +, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 10:13 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:02 +, Chris Mason wrote:
The simscsi driver processes the requests in the request routine and then
offloads the completion callback to a tasklet. This is buggy because there
is parallel unsynchronized access to the completion queue from the request
routine and from the tasklet.
With current SCSI architecture, requests
On 01/13/2014 05:36 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 01/10/2014 07:27 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
I would like to attend to participate in discussions related to topics
listed in the subject. As a maintainer of DM I'd be interested to
learn/discuss areas that should become a development focus in the
On 01/24/2014 03:37 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
On 01/13/2014 05:36 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 01/10/2014 07:27 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
I would like to attend to participate in discussions related to topics
listed in the subject. As a maintainer of DM I'd be interested to
learn/discuss areas
Hannes:
We have already worked on wait_event usage in megasas_issue_blocked_cmd.
That code will be posted by LSI once we received test result from LSI Q/A team.
If you see the current OCR code in Linux Driver we do re-send the IOCTL
command.
MR product does not want IOCTL timeout due to some
28 matches
Mail list logo