Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/xenbus: Use 'void' instead of 'int' for the return of xenbus_switch_state()

2014-09-28 Thread Juergen Gross
On 09/26/2014 06:36 PM, Chen Gang wrote: When xenbus_switch_state() fails, it will call xenbus_switch_fatal() internally, so need not return any status value, then use 'void' instead of 'int' for xenbus_switch_state() and __xenbus_switch_state(). Also need be sure that all callers which check th

RE: [PATCH 0/2] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Fix issues with hot-add/remove of LUNs

2014-09-28 Thread KY Srinivasan
> -Original Message- > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 6:47 AM > To: KY Srinivasan > Cc: h...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; > de...@linuxdriverproject.org; oher...@suse.com; > jbottom...@parallels.com; linux-scsi@vger.kerne

Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] driver-core: add driver asynchronous probe support

2014-09-28 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
Hi Luis, On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 02:57:17PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > +static bool drv_enable_async_probe(struct device_driver *drv, > +struct bus_type *bus) > +{ > + struct module *mod; > + > + if (!drv->owner || drv->sync_probe) > + ret

Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] driver-core: add driver asynchronous probe support

2014-09-28 Thread Tom Gundersen
Hi Luis, Thanks for the patches and the detailed analysis. Feel free to add Acked-by: Tom Gundersen Minor comments on the commit message below. On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" > > Some init systems may wish to express the desire to have

Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] driver-core: add driver asynchronous probe support

2014-09-28 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 02:57:17PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: ... > Systemd should consider enabling async probe on device drivers > it loads through systemd-udev but probably does not want to > enable it for modules loaded through systemd-modules-load > (modules-load.d). At least on m

Question regarding timeout handling in scsi_io_completion

2014-09-28 Thread Menny_Hamburger
Hi, A recent patch added a timeout into scsi_io_completion in order to avoid infinite command retries. In the case where we have a failed device and the device cannot recover from the error state: If in this case 'error' is left as 0, could this cause issues in the DM layer (mpath for example),

Re: next-20140925 build: 1 failures 106 warnings (next-20140925)

2014-09-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:02:03PM +0530, Sreekanth Reddy wrote: > Can you please let me known whether you are observing these warning > messages even after inclusion of below patch Well, today's -next has arch/arm build breakages so not immediately. signature.asc Description: Digital signature