Hi Alex,
Thanks for your comments.
Yes, I will check the feasibility of using existing sysfs infrastructure and
making it writable for configuring provisioning data.
Will update my patches accordingly.
Thanks,
Sayali
-Original Message-
From: Alex Lemberg [mailto:alex.lemb...@wdc.com]
On 05/26/18 19:14, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi Bodo,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc6]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
Sorry for
On 30/05/2018 15:28, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-05-30 15:08:37 [+0100], John Garry wrote:
On 30/05/2018 14:45, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
excellent. So no more objections from your side or is this a complaint I
didn't fully decode?
I think the original code is not great
On 2018-05-30 15:08:37 [+0100], John Garry wrote:
> On 30/05/2018 14:45, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > excellent. So no more objections from your side or is this a complaint I
> > didn't fully decode?
>
> I think the original code is not great since we're dropping the lock but
>
On 30/05/2018 14:45, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-05-30 14:37:50 [+0100], John Garry wrote:
On 30/05/2018 12:22, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Yes, there are the same on vanilla and not on RT. However my point is
that the code does this instead:
local_irq_save();
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199887
Jur van der Burg (j...@avtware.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|No |Yes
--
You are
On 2018-05-30 14:37:50 [+0100], John Garry wrote:
> On 30/05/2018 12:22, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Yes, there are the same on vanilla and not on RT. However my point is
> > that the code does this instead:
> > local_irq_save();
> > spin_unlock();
>
> Ah, I just noticed that
On 30/05/2018 12:22, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-05-30 12:16:23 [+0100], John Garry wrote:
On 30/05/2018 11:16, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-05-30 10:34:12 [+0100], John Garry wrote:
Sorry, but personally I don't see much value in this change. I think it's
better for
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199887
Bug ID: 199887
Summary: Fibre login failure on older adapters
Product: SCSI Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 4.14.44
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Tree:
On 2018-05-30 12:16:23 [+0100], John Garry wrote:
> On 30/05/2018 11:16, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2018-05-30 10:34:12 [+0100], John Garry wrote:
> > > Sorry, but personally I don't see much value in this change. I think it's
> > > better for safety to be consistent in how we lock &
On 30/05/2018 11:16, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-05-30 10:34:12 [+0100], John Garry wrote:
Sorry, but personally I don't see much value in this change. I think it's
better for safety to be consistent in how we lock & unlock the spinlock,
i.e. use irqsave variant (or similar).
The
On 2018-05-30 10:34:12 [+0100], John Garry wrote:
> Sorry, but personally I don't see much value in this change. I think it's
> better for safety to be consistent in how we lock & unlock the spinlock,
> i.e. use irqsave variant (or similar).
The lock should do irqsave() and unlock irqrestore().
On 23/05/2018 10:24, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-05-23 09:46:30 [+0100], John Garry wrote:
On 22/05/2018 18:31, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-05-18 14:31:27 [+0100], John Garry wrote:
On 04/05/2018 15:50, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Since commit 312d3e56119a
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG
For one GFP_DMA32 does not actually work with kmalloc, as we only
have GFP_DMA and GFP_KERNEL caches, but not GFP_DMA32. Second the
memory is mapped using the proper DMA API anyway, which would include
proper bounce buffering if needed by the device.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
15 matches
Mail list logo
