's maintaining
this driver?
--
--------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
|
ns corespond to the kernel ones.
I can tell you that the last working version for me is 50834. You can
find the version number in aacraid.h, that's the value of
the AAC_DRIVER_BUILD constant.
the 50877 driver has been broken since it was out several months ago!
--
--
, and nobody
answered... aacraid doesn't work properly neither with ASR7xx5 or
ASR8xx5 cards.
--
--------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
Le Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:48:09 +0100
Emmanuel Florac écrivait:
> Le Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:12:53 -0500 (EST)
> Laurence Oberman écrivait:
>
> > All attempts to get my drive and changer firmware updated have
> > failed. So I wont be able to add another "tested by"
or should I compile another kernel?
--
--------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
645] scsi 16:1:7:0: Attached scsi generic sg20 type 0
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
---
. Rebooting with 4.13, now...
--
--------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
pgpiO9bja167Q.pgp
Description: Signature digitale OpenPGP
sks works perfectly
fine with a 4.13 kernel, and not at all with 4.14, 4.15, 4.16. I didn't
test 4.17 yet but...
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
7.839965] scsi 6:1:133:0: Direct-Access HGST HUH721212AL5200 A3D0
PQ: 1 ANSI: 6
[7.840939] scsi 6:1:134:0: Direct-Access HGST HUH721212AL5200 A3D0
PQ: 1 ANSI: 6
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direc
Le Wed, 27 Jun 2018 18:20:27 +0200
Emmanuel Florac écrivait:
> As per my previous post, I've determined that the aacraid driver
> doesn't work with current Adaptec RAID controllers (ASR8xxx family,
> latest firmware) with kernels over 4.14. Kernel up to 4.15 works with
&
raid :01:00.0: ARC Reset attempt failed
--
--------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
-
OP reset succeded
[ 219.915742] aacraid: Comm Interface type2 enabled
[ 233.140378] aacraid :01:00.0: Scheduling bus rescan
[ 246.771302] INFO: task kworker/u24:3:79 blocked for more than 120
seconds.
--
--------
Emmanuel
l. Maybe the drive is
faulty? The cabling?
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
e
> the documentation).
I currently have one IBM LTO-4, one HP LTO-5 and one HP LTO-6 drives.
I'll try to run some tests tomorrow.
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
o the user. The last step is to
> introduce the new positioning methods.
>
> The new positioning methods should perhaps be defined so that both
> the partition number and the block number are specified together. A
> proper tape address needs both.
>
Sounds good.
> But I think we
want to test the patch, note that the current mt-st does not
> accept negative numbers. A minimal patch is needed.
OK I'm going to try this one.
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
in mode sense page 11h (see LTO SCSI reference) and present
it back so that we could know how the tape is actually partitioned :)
--
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
---
d you get the benefit of being able to
> set an explicit size for partition 0 or partition 1.
>
> You could overload the value of 0 as well to use FDP to choose the
> sizes for the partitions (assuming 0 doesn't already have a side
> effect in the code). Then you get whatever the tape drive wants to d
old for this command.
The options set: buffer-writes async-writes read-ahead debug can-bsr
can-partitions
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
Le Wed, 6 Jan 2016 17:10:15 +0100
Emmanuel Florac écrivait:
> Works OK with LTO-5 (HP). Sizing the partitions is quite difficult, as
> you can see. To get one "wrap" in the first partition, "140" and
> "1424000" work, but "145" doesn'
Le Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:46:26 +0100
Emmanuel Florac écrivait:
> That works fine for me. I'm going to do some testing with other drives
> I have (LTO-3 -- should fail -- and LTO-5).
>
Works OK with LTO-5 (HP). Sizing the partitions is quite difficult, as
you can see. To get one
tions 0", should be 1 for an LTO-5
drive. Weird.
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
-
eing reinstalled.
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
the latest one.
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
--
To u
tition: 0
EarlyWarningSize: 0
NumPartitions: 0
MaxPartitions: 3
--
--------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
---
215
SCSI ID: 0
SCSI LUN: 0
Ready: yes
BufferedMode: yes
Medium Type: Not Loaded
Density Code: 0x5a
BlockSize: 0
DataCompEnabled: yes
DataCompCapable: yes
DataDeCompEnabled: yes
CompType: 0x1
DeCompType: 0x1
BOP: yes
Block Position: 0
ActivePartition: 0
EarlyWarningSize: 0
NumPartitions: 0
MaxPartition
e
> retained).
OK, I'll test 'mt load' first, then the new patch. Stay tuned...
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
on past beginning of
medium
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
--
To unsu
st0: Add. Sense: Invalid field in parameter
list
Dec 30 19:26:12 shakuhachi kernel: st 7:0:0:0: st0: Partitioning of tape failed.
--
--------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
54 shakuhachi kernel: st0: Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
Dec 29 18:55:54 shakuhachi kernel: st0: Add. Sense: Invalid field in parameter
list
Dec 29 18:55:54 shakuhachi kernel: st 7:0:0:0: st0: Partitioning of tape failed.
Dec 29 18:55:54 shakuhachi kernel: st 7:0:0:0: st0: Rewinding tape
GB. I don't know if this is a useful
> addition.
Oh BTW I didn't check what's happening in code, but actual values
should be 37.5 GB for partition 0 and 1425 GB for partition 1, not the
other way around.
--
------
BS 10, BLL 8
Dec 29 17:57:38 shakuhachi kernel: st 7:0:0:0: st0: Density 58, tape length: 0,
drv buffer: 1
Dec 29 17:57:38 shakuhachi kernel: st 7:0:0:0: st0: Block size: 0, buffer size:
4096 (1 blocks).
--
--------
Emma
o be any difference with newer (or older) kernels,
anyway.
Do you want me to try anything in particular? Is my mt version OK (v
1.1)?
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
|
tions. For the HP Ultrium this
> should result in partition 0 of 1425 GB and 1 of 37.5 GB. I don't
> know if this is a useful addition.
Great I'll give it a try soon next week!
--
----
Emmanuel Flor
r.
I'd like to be able to partition LTO media through standard commands,
like "mt mkpartition", mostly to be able to create LTFS tapes without
relying on hard to compile code from IBM/HP/Quantum/Oracle.
--
-----
Print(("lin_tape: too many partitions %d\n",
usr_part->number_of_partitions));
rc = -EINVAL;
goto EXIT_LABEL;
} /* if */
Interestingly it seems to support both wrap partitioning and
longit
ust in case.
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
--
To unsub
Le Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:06:44 +0100
Emmanuel Florac écrivait:
>
> I'm trying to use mt to work with LTO-5 and bigger tapes. Switching
> partitions works:
>
> # tapeinfo -f /dev/sg1
> Product Type: Tape Drive
> Vendor ID: 'HP '
> Product ID: 'Ult
Le Sun, 27 Sep 2015 12:28:41 +0200
Gionatan Danti écrivait:
> Il 23-09-2015 17:18 Emmanuel Florac ha scritto:
> >
> > Use XFS. XFS won't let you mount it several time on different
> > machines without various "force" options.
> > Alternatively, use a c
different machines
without various "force" options.
Alternatively, use a cluster-aware FS like ocfs2. Ocfs2 is quite easy
to set up.
--
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
---
d
backplane type: basically work fine with 50 cm cables, and fails with 80
cm cables with some backplanes (works with Supermicro, not with AIC,
etc).
So what is the backplane and cables you're using?
--
----
Emmanuel Florac |
through the module list and couldn't find anything else
that could reasonably fit with an LSI driver, so I'm pretty sure it
must be the megaraid driver... If only it could be a normal Linux
system, alas.
--
--------
Emmanuel
PERC 8 Mini [vmhba2]
Class 0104: 1000:002f
Could you grab the file /usr/lib/vmware/vmkmod/megaraid_sas.ko and run
modinfo on it (even from a different distro, should work fine I
suppose).
--
--------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction te
e hardware (different PCI ids, to begin
with).
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
--
To unsubscribe from this list: s
#x27;s probably the case. As I said, I'd first try installing ESXi
on a blade to check what driver it uses for this particular card (ESXi
is a special Linux distro after all).
--
----
Emmanuel Florac
se ESXi lets you
check (with modinfo) if megaraid_sas manages it.
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
eaning :)
--
----
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
|
| +33 1 78 94
47 matches
Mail list logo
