On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> On 2/3/2014 2:51 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> This is not simple and not going to happen. Sibling devices in /sys cannot
>> have a relationship in udev, there are only parent/child dependencies.
>
> Ok.. so if we
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> On 14-02-03 10:08 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>> So whats wrong with the simple solution? You throw the ones for st
>> away, and
>> create the st handles from the nst worker.
>
>
> Doesn't seem to be any good solutions to this
> probl
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> On 2/3/2014 9:06 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>
>> That's due to udev. Udev is getting events for each device it should create
>> a device node for. So for 'st' it'll get a series of events for 'stX', and
>> another series of events for 'nstX'.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Markus Rathgeb
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Do you remember?
> I get it again, is there something I could do?
>
> I attached a file that contains the "udevadm monitor" log.
>
> I am using a v3.5.0 linux kernel (containing some gentoo patches).
> Should I test it with a vani
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 23:05 -0600, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Kay Sievers wrote:
> > Is the udev daemon (still) running while it fails?
>
> Yes, and there's something else I forgot to mention that may be
> significant... For the bad case, in addition to udevd, "ps -ef
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 09:43 +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> Bob Tracy wrote:
> > That was quick :-). Backing out the sysctl_check.c diff gives me a
> > working kernel. Beats the [EMAIL PROTECTED] out of me how/why, though.
> >
> > Michael Cree: could you try backing out the diff below from your
> >
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Bob Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Bob Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Current state of the source tree is the 6f37ac... version, so I'll
> > > > > start backing out the above dif
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 11:46 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:42 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 11:31 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > Doesn't this circularity now exist for everything? Every device that
> > > create
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 11:31 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:24 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 11:13 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:04 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 31 O
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 11:13 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:04 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > > > Yes, the queue is a child of the disk.
> > >
> > > Right, so this goes gendisk->queue (-> meaning parent of, or takes
> > >
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 10:15 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 07:32 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Hm, I seem to have missed the part in this thread where someone said
> > that it was valid to have a parent reference a child device. That's
> > just wrong and needs to be fixed. Is t
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 21:25 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 08:13:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 14:47 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not sure if
On Oct 31, 2007 1:40 AM, Mark M. Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-30 13:25:43 -0500]:
> > On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:58 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > > James Bottomley wrote:
> > > >> > struct attribute_group {
> > > >> >const char
int (*filter_show)(struct kobject *, int);
> >
> > > Actually, it returns a true/false value indicating whether the given
> > > attribute should be displayed.
> >
> > How about this:
> >
> > int (*is_visible)(...);
>
>
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 14:47 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if we can do this patch. If you kill a device, you see
> > there's a processing state in scsi_prep_fn() for SDEV_DEL, which has a
> > printk message I see quite often when I unplu
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 12:28 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:27 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 11:57 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 17:54 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2007-10-29 a
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 11:57 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 17:54 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 10:16 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > struct attribute_group {
> > > const char *name;
> > > + i
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 10:16 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> In the SCSI transport classes (and soon to be in the AEN event
> subsystem) we have a lot of need for a grouping that doesn't include all
> files in the group. We basically want to show capability by which file
> is present. A classic ex
On 10/2/07, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 17:10 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 10:05 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 17:02 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > > On 10/2/07, James
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 10:05 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 17:02 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On 10/2/07, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 21:22 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007
On 10/2/07, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 21:22 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 07:39:02PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 07:36:10PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > One possibility we could do is to add a
> > >
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 15:08 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 20:32 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 13:23 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 19:54 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > > Hi James,
> > &g
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 13:23 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 19:54 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > Hi James,
> > seems we miss the following fix in the current tree.
> >
> > From: Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [SCSI] fi
Hi James,
seems we miss the following fix in the current tree.
Thanks,
Kay
From: Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [SCSI] fix scsi_is_sdev_device() after switch to default sdev
attributes
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sc
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 14:29 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 05:00:14PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > From: Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [SCSI] switch sdev sysfs attributes to default attributes
> >
> > This removes the u
From: Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [SCSI] switch sdev sysfs attributes to default attributes
This removes the unused sysfs attribute overwriting logic for most of
the attributes, and plugs them into the driver core default attribute
creation.
Without this patch, at the time
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 09:26 -0700, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:00:53 +0200
> "Kay Sievers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 8/8/07, Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Here is an updated set of pa
On 8/8/07, Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is an updated set of patches that implement Asynchronous Notification
> support for ATAPI devices. In this version I no longer export the AN
> capability through genhd, and the uevent is sent by the scsi_device
> instead of gendi
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 13:44 -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 08:32:44PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 09:53 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 14:45 -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> > > > Any com
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 09:53 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 14:45 -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> > Any comments on this? Should I resend these patches?
>
> Well, the basic comment is that there are a lot of features that SCSI
> has that the driver core lacks:
>
> 1) Attri
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:20:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 05:15:55AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > /**
> > + * sysfs_chmod_file - update the modified mode value on an object
> > attribute.
> > + * @kobj: object we're acting for.
e attribute permissions based on capabilities.
> I would be very interested in seeing the above stuff move into the
> driver core.
Point 3) seems to work for me. :)
Thanks,
Kay
---
sysfs: allow change of permissions for already created attributes
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROT
32 matches
Mail list logo
