Re: [PATCH] USB: storage: add "no SYNCHRONIZE CACHE" quirk

2015-06-22 Thread Markus Rathgeb
>> > Maybe your patch will be acceptable, though. We'll have to hear from >> > Markus and Matt. >> >> We'll probably have to take this to fsdevel as well ... they might have >> opinions about whether the FS wants to be informed about flush failure. So, it is okay to wait for the end of that discu

Re: [PATCH] USB: storage: add "no SYNCHRONIZE CACHE" quirk

2015-06-22 Thread Markus Rathgeb
> Please test it now. I'd like to know if it fixes your problem, > regardless of how the discussion goes. Seems to be working, I also attached the kernel log. The "flush failed" will grow with disc activity (but that was to be expected). Jun 22 23:24:50 m3800 kernel: usb 1-3: new high-speed USB

Re: [PATCH SCSI] sr: check_events() ignore GET_EVENT when TUR says otherwise

2012-07-30 Thread Markus Rathgeb
Hello! Do you remember? I get it again, is there something I could do? I attached a file that contains the "udevadm monitor" log. I am using a v3.5.0 linux kernel (containing some gentoo patches). Should I test it with a vanilla one? Here the versions of some packages (kernel, udev, systemd): s

Re: [PATCH SCSI] sr: check_events() ignore GET_EVENT when TUR says otherwise

2012-07-30 Thread Markus Rathgeb
> I have 3.5 here and see the loop too, but it stops after a couple of seconds: > > first: KERNEL[15636.368034] > last: KERNEL[15638.879796] Ah, sorry then. The udev messages reported by the udev monitor reported up to 20 seconds of udev (userspace) events. I did not filter kernel reported message