On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 01:48:39PM +0530, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:12:40AM +0530, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Neil Horman <n
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:12:40AM +0530, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:30:04AM +0530, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Neil Horman <n
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:30:04AM +0530, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:52:37PM +0530, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Bart Van Assche
> >
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:52:37PM +0530, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Bart Van Assche
> wrote:
> > On 09/01/2016 03:31 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> >>
> >> I reduced the ISR workload by one third in-order to reduce the time
> >> that is
ive with sub FCOE_CTLR_START_DELAY
> periodicity.
>
> Tested-by: Narendra K <narendr...@dell.com>
> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>
> Acked-by: Vasu Dev <vasu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: U
work_struct might be active when the housing
fc_rport struct gets freed. Ensure that we cancel it prior to freeing the rport
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
CC: James E.J. Bottomley jbottom...@parallels.com
CC: Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org
CC: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
CC
a per-cpu lookup, since we're certain not to get
rescheduled.
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
CC: James E.J. Bottomley jbottom...@parallels.com
CC: Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org
CC: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
CC: Robert Love robert.w.l...@intel.com
CC: Vasu Dev vasu
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:22:50PM -0700, Vasu Dev wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 10:59 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
debugfs caught this:
WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:260 debug_print_object+0x83/0xa0()
ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: work_struct
hint: fc_scsi_scan_rport+0x0
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:38:41AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:16:37PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
Given fcoe is quite mature now and its patches volume is very low, so
getting its kernel patches directly to scsi subsystem should work fine
and should be okay
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 11:09:43AM -0700, Vasu Dev wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 16:54 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:22:50PM -0700, Vasu Dev wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 10:59 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
debugfs caught this:
WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:260
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:22:50PM -0700, Vasu Dev wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 10:59 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
debugfs caught this:
WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:260 debug_print_object+0x83/0xa0()
ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: work_struct
hint: fc_scsi_scan_rport+0x0
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 08:37:57AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 05:13:11AM +, Eddie Wai wrote:
On May 30, 2014, at 7:48 PM, Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 02:59:43PM -0700, Eddie Wai wrote:
Thanks for fixing
work_struct might be active when the housing
fc_rport struct gets freed. Ensure that we cancel it prior to freeing the rport
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
CC: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
CC: Robert Love robert.w.l...@intel.com
CC: Vasu Dev vasu@intel.com
---
drivers/scsi
a per-cpu lookup, since we're certain not to get
rescheduled.
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
CC: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
CC: Robert Love robert.w.l...@intel.com
CC: Vasu Dev vasu@intel.com
---
drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c | 16
1 file changed, 4
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:47:26PM -0700, Robert Love wrote:
Simply remove an extra space that violates coding style.
Signed-off-by: Robert Love robert.w.l...@intel.com
Tested-by: Jack Morgan jack.mor...@intel.com
Acked-by: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
---
drivers/scsi/libfc
be logged if the code
reaches this point.
Signed-off-by: Robert Love robert.w.l...@intel.com
Tested-by: Jack Morgan jack.mor...@intel.com
Acked-by: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
---
drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_transport.c |6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff
...@intel.com
Tested-by: Jack Morgan jack.mor...@intel.com
Acked-by: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
---
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
index e98ea6a..5879929 100644
-off-by: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
Reported-by: Honggang LI ho...@redhat.com
CC: James E.J. Bottomley jbottom...@parallels.com
CC: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/scsi/cxgbi/libcxgbi.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/cxgbi/libcxgbi.h
as this patch makes
them to be.
Signed-off-by: Robert Love robert.w.l...@intel.com
Acked-by: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
---
drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_sysfs.c | 44
+++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe
Thanks, for the series
Acked-by: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
@Mark:
Initial patch now optimizes enum-to-string memory usage and
string retreival
--
v3:
This series applies to the v3.6 kernel.
@Bart: Fixed bus_create_file - bus_attrs
Removed sscanf with non
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 11:59:29AM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 15:23 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
James, Robert-
I've been doing lots of backports of FCoE code to the RHEL tree these
last few months, and I've noticed something fairly irritating, and I
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 09:54:32AM -0700, Robert Love wrote:
This patch does a few things.
1) Makes /sys/bus/fcoe/ctlr_{create,destroy} interfaces.
These interfaces take an ifname and will either
create an FCoE Controller or destroy an FCoE
Controller depending on which file is
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 09:31:08PM +, Love, Robert W wrote:
On 10/4/2012 12:08 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 10/03/2012 10:12 PM, Robert Love wrote:
The user space HBA API vendor libraries need to know which HBA/CNAs
hosts to manage. Currently, libhbalinux is used to manage a few
23 matches
Mail list logo