Re: [OpenFCoE PATCH] If expecting pre-T11 frames, a T11 frame caused a data fault.

Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Just wondering: > >>From my quick reading of the code these pre-T11 frames are basically > a different frame-level protocol. Given that T11 has standardized > on a different one what's the rationale for supporting the old frames? There is still some use in lab environm

Re: [OpenFCoE PATCH] If expecting pre-T11 frames, a T11 frame caused a data fault.

Just wondering: >From my quick reading of the code these pre-T11 frames are basically a different frame-level protocol. Given that T11 has standardized on a different one what's the rationale for supporting the old frames? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i

[OpenFCoE PATCH] If expecting pre-T11 frames, a T11 frame caused a data fault.

If expecting pre-T11 frames, a T11 frame caused a data fault. This is because the T11 frames have zeros where the old length/SOF field was, and a length of less than the size of the FC header was not checked for. Also limit length error messages to frames (per-CPU actually). Signed-off-by: Joe E