Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] qla2xxx: fix potential deadlock on ha-hardware_lock

2012-10-09 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
Hi Jiri, Andrew, Arun Co, On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 09:23 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: Lockdep reports: === [ cut here ] === = [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] 3.6.0-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #1 Not tainted

Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] qla2xxx: fix potential deadlock on ha-hardware_lock

2012-10-09 Thread Arun Easi
Hi Nick, On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, 11:47am -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: Hi Jiri, Andrew, Arun Co, --8-- snipped -- Also please have a look below for a few more related items I noticed while reviewing this patch.. drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3

[PATCH] [RESEND] qla2xxx: fix potential deadlock on ha-hardware_lock

2012-10-08 Thread Jiri Kosina
Lockdep reports: === [ cut here ] === = [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] 3.6.0-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #1 Not tainted - qla2xxx_1_dpc/368 just changed the

Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] qla2xxx: fix potential deadlock on ha-hardware_lock

2012-10-08 Thread Srivatsa S. Bhat
On 10/08/2012 12:53 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote: Lockdep reports: === [ cut here ] === = [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] 3.6.0-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #1 Not tainted

Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] qla2xxx: fix potential deadlock on ha-hardware_lock

2012-10-08 Thread Saurav Kashyap
Acked-by: Saurav Kashyap saurav.kash...@qlogic.com Thanks, ~Saurav Lockdep reports: === [ cut here ] === = [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] 3.6.0-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #1 Not tainted