On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 18:57 +0200, h...@lst.de wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:14:22PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Commit ca18d6f769d2 ("block: Make most scsi_req_init() calls implicit")
> > introduced the scsi_initialize_rq() function in such a way that it is not
> > only
> > called for
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:14:22PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Commit ca18d6f769d2 ("block: Make most scsi_req_init() calls implicit")
> introduced the scsi_initialize_rq() function in such a way that it is not only
> called for pass-through requests but also for FS requests. Because that commi
On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 14:09 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 02:05:35PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Requests are unprepared and reprepared when being requeued. Avoid
> > that requeuing resets .jiffies_at_alloc and .retries by initializing
> > these two member variable
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 02:05:35PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Requests are unprepared and reprepared when being requeued. Avoid
> that requeuing resets .jiffies_at_alloc and .retries by initializing
> these two member variables from inside blk_get_request() and by
> preserving both member vari
Requests are unprepared and reprepared when being requeued. Avoid
that requeuing resets .jiffies_at_alloc and .retries by initializing
these two member variables from inside blk_get_request() and by
preserving both member variables when preparing a request. This patch
affects the requeuing behavior
5 matches
Mail list logo