There are same conditions for checking whether supporting clkscaling or
not.
When ufshcd is supporting clkscaling, active_reqs should be decreased by
two.
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/d
Hi,
On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 09:19:57 PM Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> There are same conditions for checking whether supporting clkscaling or
> not.
> When ufshcd is supporting clkscaling, active_reqs should be decreased by
> two.
I guess you meant "one" here, not "two"?
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Ch
On 2017-03-21 05:19, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
There are same conditions for checking whether supporting clkscaling or
not.
When ufshcd is supporting clkscaling, active_reqs should be decreased
by
two.
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(
Jaehoon Chung writes:
Jaehoon,
> There are same conditions for checking whether supporting clkscaling
> or not. When ufshcd is supporting clkscaling, active_reqs should be
> decreased by two.
Applied to 4.11/scsi-fixes.
Thank you!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
4 matches
Mail list logo