On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:05:55 -0600
James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 09:57 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
This is against the scsi-bidi tree.
We need to use the cmd_type of a leading request for scsi_init_sgtable
to set up scsi_data_buffer:length of a bidi
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 09:57 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
This is against the scsi-bidi tree.
We need to use the cmd_type of a leading request for scsi_init_sgtable
to set up scsi_data_buffer:length of a bidi request properly.
An alternative approach is setting the cmd_type of a leading
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:22:47 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:05:55 -0600
James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 09:57 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
This is against the scsi-bidi tree.
We need to use the cmd_type of a
This is against the scsi-bidi tree.
We need to use the cmd_type of a leading request for scsi_init_sgtable
to set up scsi_data_buffer:length of a bidi request properly.
An alternative approach is setting the cmd_type of a leading request
and its bidi request (*1). But the block layer and scsi-ml
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:05 -0600:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 09:57 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
This is against the scsi-bidi tree.
We need to use the cmd_type of a leading request for scsi_init_sgtable
to set up scsi_data_buffer:length of a bidi request properly.
5 matches
Mail list logo