Il 28/05/2014 03:48, Ming Lei ha scritto:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 27/05/2014 18:50, Venkatesh Srinivas ha scritto:
Hi,
I think this patch has a small race involving just two commands:
1. The first command to a target is in
Hi,
I think this patch has a small race involving just two commands:
1. The first command to a target is in virtscsi_pick_vq(), after
atomic_inc_return(tgt-tgt_lock)) but before write_seqcount_begin()
2. A second command to the same target enters virtscsi_pick_vq(). It
will hit the same
Il 27/05/2014 18:50, Venkatesh Srinivas ha scritto:
Hi,
I think this patch has a small race involving just two commands:
1. The first command to a target is in virtscsi_pick_vq(), after
atomic_inc_return(tgt-tgt_lock)) but before write_seqcount_begin()
2. A second command to the same target
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 27/05/2014 18:50, Venkatesh Srinivas ha scritto:
Hi,
I think this patch has a small race involving just two commands:
1. The first command to a target is in virtscsi_pick_vq(), after
4 matches
Mail list logo