no problem, although if these rules were published, I would have tried
to do so earlier.
although - I do have a couple of questions.
On 9/5/2014 1:35 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I've applied the series, but for next time can you make sure to follow
the proper format:
- remove the version
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:31 -0400, James Smart wrote:
On 9/5/2014 1:35 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
- patches that you send on with your maintainer hat on should be
signed off by you, not just reviewed.
ok - but I guess I had a different interpretation of the meaning for
signed-by.
I've applied the series, but for next time can you make sure to follow
the proper format:
- remove the version number in every subject line
- patches you resend from an original author should be unchanged,
except that the From: lines moves into the mail body
- patches that you send on with
Update lpfc version to driver version 10.4.8000.0
This patch set updates the lpfc driver to revision 10.4.8000.0
The patches for 10.4.8000.0 contain:
- Incorporate patches posted to linux-scsi
- Mark functions as static in lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
- Mark functions as static in lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
-
4 matches
Mail list logo
