Re: [PATCH 0/4] New SCSI command timeout handler

2013-06-07 Thread Jörn Engel
On Fri, 7 June 2013 14:54:16 +0800, Ren Mingxin wrote: > On 06/06/2013 05:43 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > This approach may not work for some LLDDs as you said, but I wonder > whether SAS is applicable(whether there will be later patches for > SAS). We have tested a derived patch on SAS and it

Re: [PATCH 0/4] New SCSI command timeout handler

2013-06-07 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 06/07/2013 08:54 AM, Ren Mingxin wrote: > Hi, Hannes: > > On 06/06/2013 05:43 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> this is the first step towards a new non-blocking >> error handler. This patch implements a new command >> timeout handler which will be sending command aborts >> inline without engaging

Re: [PATCH 0/4] New SCSI command timeout handler

2013-06-07 Thread Ren Mingxin
Hi, Hannes: On 06/06/2013 05:43 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: this is the first step towards a new non-blocking error handler. This patch implements a new command timeout handler which will be sending command aborts inline without engaging SCSI EH. In addition the commands will be returned directl

[PATCH 0/4] New SCSI command timeout handler

2013-06-06 Thread Hannes Reinecke
Hi all, this is the first step towards a new non-blocking error handler. This patch implements a new command timeout handler which will be sending command aborts inline without engaging SCSI EH. In addition the commands will be returned directly if the command abort succeeded, cutting down recove