Alex Turin wrote:
On 12/6/2012 5:04 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 12/06/12 15:27, Or Gerlitz wrote:
The core problem here seems to be that scsi_remove_host simply never
ends.
Hello Or,
The later patches in the srp-ha patch series avoided such behavior by
checking whether the c
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
[...]
> looking on the current locks in the system, we see that this kworker task
> holds four locks, but none of them seems to be mutually held by another task,
That was ofcourse a wrong assertion, as a lock can't be mutually held
by two tasks..
On 12/6/2012 5:04 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 12/06/12 15:27, Or Gerlitz wrote:
The core problem here seems to be that scsi_remove_host simply never
ends.
Hello Or,
The later patches in the srp-ha patch series avoided such behavior by
checking whether the connection between SRP initiator a
On 06/12/2012 17:04, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 12/06/12 15:27, Or Gerlitz wrote:
The core problem here seems to be that scsi_remove_host simply never
ends.
Hello Or,
The later patches in the srp-ha patch series avoided such behavior by
checking whether the connection between SRP initiator an
On 12/06/12 15:27, Or Gerlitz wrote:
The core problem here seems to be that scsi_remove_host simply never ends.
Hello Or,
The later patches in the srp-ha patch series avoided such behavior by
checking whether the connection between SRP initiator and target is
unique, and by removing duplicat
On 06/12/2012 16:10, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 12/05/12 22:32, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Bart Van Assche
wrote:
[...]
The only way to make I/O work reliably if a failure can occur at the
transport layer is to use multipathd on top of ib_srp. If a
connection fails
for
On 12/05/12 22:32, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
[...]
The only way to make I/O work reliably if a failure can occur at the
transport layer is to use multipathd on top of ib_srp. If a connection fails
for some reason, then the SRP SCSI host will be rem
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
[...]
> The only way to make I/O work reliably if a failure can occur at the
> transport layer is to use multipathd on top of ib_srp. If a connection fails
> for some reason, then the SRP SCSI host will be removed after the SCSI error
> handle
On 12/05/12 19:50, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 12/05/12 19:23, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:21 AM, David Dillow wrote:
[...]
Modulo a few style issues (braces around one line if branches, etc.) and
having three state variables vs one, I can live with everything up to
aabfa852acd27
On 12/05/12 19:23, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:21 AM, David Dillow wrote:
[...]
Modulo a few style issues (braces around one line if branches, etc.) and
having three state variables vs one, I can live with everything up to
aabfa852acd27962 at git://github.com/bvanassche/linux.gi
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:21 AM, David Dillow wrote:
[...]
> Modulo a few style issues (braces around one line if branches, etc.) and
> having three state variables vs one, I can live with everything up to
> aabfa852acd27962 at git://github.com/bvanassche/linux.git#srp-ha. Those
> two are small th
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 12:21 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:04 PM, David Dillow wrote:
> > We can push it through James's tree if need be, but Bart's code is
> > pretty self-contained, and going through the SCSI tree will introduce
> > merge dependencies. It'd be much easie
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:04 PM, David Dillow wrote:
> We can push it through James's tree if need be, but Bart's code is
> pretty self-contained, and going through the SCSI tree will introduce
> merge dependencies. It'd be much easier to push it all through the RDMA
> tree, especially if we want
On 28 November 2012 03:34, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
>>
>> Here is a first, UNTESTED, pass at preparing a merge of Bart's SRP HA
>> work to upstream. It is not complete, as I have not yet added the
>> transport layer error handling and related patches. It is a
On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
Here is a first, UNTESTED, pass at preparing a merge of Bart's SRP HA
work to upstream. It is not complete, as I have not yet added the
transport layer error handling and related patches. It is also currently
missing the patch to maintain a single connection
On 27/11/2012 06:04, David Dillow wrote:
We can push it through James's tree if need be, but Bart's code is
pretty self-contained, and going through the SCSI tree will introduce
merge dependencies. It'd be much easier to push it all through the
RDMA tree
Yep, this makes sense to me even witho
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 09:57 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 6:44 AM, David Dillow wrote:
> > One may also pull this series from github:
> > git pull git://github.com/dillow/srp-initiator.git ha-merge-v1
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> The kernel maintainers file specifies the followi
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 23:15 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:50 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > - I think the srp_transport stuff should go through linux-scsi /
> > James B.
> >instead of my tree, esp. since it's shared with the IBM vscsi stuff
> > (I think)
> > - I se
> I'm amenable to that, but we do need an agreed patch set, as Roland
> says. I also hate to apply the pressure, but I suspect -rc7 was the
> last -rc, so I'm expecting the merge window to open on 2/12.
I think the srp_transport bits are all simple and non-controversial.
So at least from my persp
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:50 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> - I think the srp_transport stuff should go through linux-scsi /
> James B.
>instead of my tree, esp. since it's shared with the IBM vscsi stuff
> (I think)
> - I see Bart had a few comments about a few of your patches, I'll
> wait
>
> This series compiles, but is otherwise UNTESTED. I'll be working on that
> over the next few days, with an eye on getting as much of Bart's work
> into 3.8 as possible.
Hi Dave,
Great to have you back. Certainly I'd like to get this stuff into 3.8 too.
A couple of comments:
- I think the
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 6:44 AM, David Dillow wrote:
> One may also pull this series from github:
> git pull git://github.com/dillow/srp-initiator.git ha-merge-v1
Hi Dave,
The kernel maintainers file specifies the following tree
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dad/srp-initi
Here is a first, UNTESTED, pass at preparing a merge of Bart's SRP HA
work to upstream. It is not complete, as I have not yet added the
transport layer error handling and related patches. It is also currently
missing the patch to maintain a single connection for an I_T nexus.
I swapped Ishai's cod
23 matches
Mail list logo
