On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 08:06:39AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> We check for REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FUA in so many places though, might not
> be a bad idea to keep the helper but just make it take the opf and fix
> up the other locations too. The fact that PREFLUSH|FUA is the magic to
> check for is some
On Mon, Jan 23 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We can't initalize the elevator fields for flushes as flush share space
> in struct request with the elevator data. But currently we can't
> commnicate that a request is a flush through blk_get_request as we
> can only pass READ or WRITE, and the low
On 01/23/2017 04:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We can't initalize the elevator fields for flushes as flush share space
> in struct request with the elevator data. But currently we can't
> commnicate that a request is a flush through blk_get_request as we
> can only pass READ or WRITE, and the
We can't initalize the elevator fields for flushes as flush share space
in struct request with the elevator data. But currently we can't
commnicate that a request is a flush through blk_get_request as we
can only pass READ or WRITE, and the low-level code looks at the
possible NULL bio to check fo
4 matches
Mail list logo