Re: [PATCH 1/5] add dma_max_segment_size option to scsi_host_template

2007-09-29 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:31:14 -0400 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FUJITA Tomonori wrote: You are right. scsi_debug's pseudo-bus works. But probabaly, scsi_debug doesn't need to call blk_queue_max_segment_size now. Either way works for me. :) Maybe dev_set_max_seg() is a

Re: [PATCH 1/5] add dma_max_segment_size option to scsi_host_template

2007-09-27 Thread Jeff Garzik
FUJITA Tomonori wrote: You are right. scsi_debug's pseudo-bus works. But probabaly, scsi_debug doesn't need to call blk_queue_max_segment_size now. Either way works for me. :) Maybe dev_set_max_seg() is a better name, if people get really picky (I don't care). How about

[PATCH 1/5] add dma_max_segment_size option to scsi_host_template

2007-09-26 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
This patch moves blk_queue_max_segment_size to scsi_alloc_queue from llds. It enables scsi_add_host to tells iommu lld's dma_max_segment_size. If a low-level driver doesn't specify dma_max_segment_size, scsi-ml uses 65536 (MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE). So there are not any functional changes. Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH 1/5] add dma_max_segment_size option to scsi_host_template

2007-09-26 Thread Jens Axboe
On Wed, Sep 26 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: This patch moves blk_queue_max_segment_size to scsi_alloc_queue from llds. It enables scsi_add_host to tells iommu lld's dma_max_segment_size. If a low-level driver doesn't specify dma_max_segment_size, scsi-ml uses 65536 (MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE). So there

Re: [PATCH 1/5] add dma_max_segment_size option to scsi_host_template

2007-09-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
FUJITA Tomonori wrote: This patch moves blk_queue_max_segment_size to scsi_alloc_queue from llds. It enables scsi_add_host to tells iommu lld's dma_max_segment_size. If a low-level driver doesn't specify dma_max_segment_size, scsi-ml uses 65536 (MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE). So there are not any functional

Re: [PATCH 1/5] add dma_max_segment_size option to scsi_host_template

2007-09-26 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:11:45 -0400 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FUJITA Tomonori wrote: This patch moves blk_queue_max_segment_size to scsi_alloc_queue from llds. It enables scsi_add_host to tells iommu lld's dma_max_segment_size. If a low-level driver doesn't specify

Re: [PATCH 1/5] add dma_max_segment_size option to scsi_host_template

2007-09-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
FUJITA Tomonori wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:11:45 -0400 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FUJITA Tomonori wrote: This patch moves blk_queue_max_segment_size to scsi_alloc_queue from llds. It enables scsi_add_host to tells iommu lld's dma_max_segment_size. If a low-level driver doesn't

Re: [PATCH 1/5] add dma_max_segment_size option to scsi_host_template

2007-09-26 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:42:06 -0400 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FUJITA Tomonori wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:11:45 -0400 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FUJITA Tomonori wrote: This patch moves blk_queue_max_segment_size to scsi_alloc_queue from llds. It enables