On 6/29/2013 11:10 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
2013/6/29 James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com:
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 22:39 +0530, Santosh Y wrote:
index 19618c6..431ddb2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1711,6 +1711,25 @@ void
On 6/29/2013 11:10 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
2013/6/29 James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com:
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 22:39 +0530, Santosh Y wrote:
index 19618c6..431ddb2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1711,6 +1711,25 @@ void
From: Akinobu Mita m...@fixstars.com
If the controller doesn't support 64-bit addressing mode, it must not
set the DMA mask to 64-bit. But it's unconditionally trying to set to
64-bit without checking 64-bit addressing support in the controller
capabilities.
It was correctly checked before
3 matches
Mail list logo