On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 10:16 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> We should be using a flag when RTPG extended header is not
> supported, that saves us sending RTPG twice for older arrays.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen
> Signed-off
We should be using a flag when RTPG extended header is not
supported, that saves us sending RTPG twice for older arrays.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c |
On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 16:08 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> We should be using a flag when RTPG extended header is not
> supported, that saves us sending RTPG twice for older arrays.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen
> Signed-off
We should be using a flag when RTPG extended header is not
supported, that saves us sending RTPG twice for older arrays.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c |
4 matches
Mail list logo