[PATCH 11/23] zfcp: drop duplicate seq_no from zfcp_fsf_req which is also in QTCB header

2018-11-08 Thread Steffen Maier
There is no point for double bookkeeping especially just for tracing. The trace can take it from the QTCB which always exists for non-SRB responses traced with zfcp_dbf_hba_fsf_res(). As a side effect, this removes an alignment hole and reduces the size of struct zfcp_fsf_req, and thus of each pen

Re: [PATCH 11/23] zfcp: drop duplicate seq_no from zfcp_fsf_req which is also in QTCB header

2018-11-16 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 11/8/18 3:44 PM, Steffen Maier wrote: There is no point for double bookkeeping especially just for tracing. The trace can take it from the QTCB which always exists for non-SRB responses traced with zfcp_dbf_hba_fsf_res(). As a side effect, this removes an alignment hole and reduces the size o