On 05/10/2017 09:07 PM, James Smart wrote:
> Code review of NVMEI's FC_PORT_ROLE_NVME_DISCOVERY
> looked wrong.
>
> Discussions with storage architecture team clarified
> NVMEI's audit of the PRLI response port roles. Following up
> discussion with code review showed a few minor corrections
>
Code review of NVMEI's FC_PORT_ROLE_NVME_DISCOVERY
looked wrong.
Discussions with storage architecture team clarified
NVMEI's audit of the PRLI response port roles. Following up
discussion with code review showed a few minor corrections
were required - especially in anticipation of NVME auto
2 matches
Mail list logo