Re: [PATCH 2/2] libata-scsi: do not response with "invalid field" for FORMAT UNIT

2016-07-04 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
On 07/05/2016 12:27 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: From: Tom Yan It does not make sense and is confusing to response with "Invalid Respond here and in the subject. field in cbd" while we have no support at all implemented for CDB. FORMAT UNIT. It is decent to let it go to the default

Re: [PATCH 2/2] libata-scsi: do not response with "invalid field" for FORMAT UNIT

2016-07-04 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
On 07/04/2016 11:53 PM, tom.t...@gmail.com wrote: From: Tom Yan It does not make sense and is confusing to response with "Invalid Respond here and in the subject. field in cbd" while we have no support at all implemented for FORMAT UNIT. It is decent to let it go to the default, which w

[PATCH 2/2] libata-scsi: do not response with "invalid field" for FORMAT UNIT

2016-07-04 Thread tom . ty89
From: Tom Yan It does not make sense and is confusing to response with "Invalid field in cbd" while we have no support at all implemented for FORMAT UNIT. It is decent to let it go to the default, which will response with "Invalid command operation code" instead. Signed-off-by: Tom Yan diff --