Hello, Bart.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:11:29PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >__blk_run_queue_uncond() is a cold path and I don't think adding a
> >test there matters but I think it would be better if we avoid an extra
> >branch if possible for __blk_run_queue(). Can't we merge
> >blk_queue_st
On 10/17/12 01:38, Tejun Heo wrote:
/**
+ * __blk_run_queue_uncond - run a queue whether or not it has been stopped
+ * @q: The queue to run
+ *
+ * Description:
+ *Invoke request handling on a queue if there are any pending requests.
+ *May be used to restart request handling after a r
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:08:01PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> A block driver may start cleaning up resources needed by its
> request_fn as soon as blk_cleanup_queue() finished, so request_fn
> must not be invoked after draining finished.
Can you please make the commit message more ver
A block driver may start cleaning up resources needed by its
request_fn as soon as blk_cleanup_queue() finished, so request_fn
must not be invoked after draining finished.
Cc: James Bottomley
Cc: Mike Christie
Cc: Jens Axboe
Cc: Tejun Heo
Cc: Chanho Min
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche
---
bl
4 matches
Mail list logo
