scsilun_to_int() has an error which prevents it from generating
correct LUN numbers for 64bit values.
Also we should remove the misleading comment about portions of
the LUN being ignored; the initiator should treat the LUN as
an opaque value.
And, finally, the example given should use the correct
On 06/03/14 10:58, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
+ * Given a struct scsi_lun of: d2 04 0b 03 00 00 00 00, this function
+ * returns the integer: 0x0b03d204
+ *
+ * This encoding will return a standard integer LUN for LUNs smaller
+ * than 256, which typically use a single level LUN
On 14-06-10 07:37 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 06/03/14 10:58, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
+ * Given a struct scsi_lun of: d2 04 0b 03 00 00 00 00, this function
+ * returns the integer: 0x0b03d204
+ *
+ * This encoding will return a standard integer LUN for LUNs smaller
+ * than
On 06/10/14 16:06, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 13:37 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 06/03/14 10:58, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
+ * Given a struct scsi_lun of: d2 04 0b 03 00 00 00 00, this function
+ * returns the integer: 0x0b03d204
+ *
+ * This encoding will
On 14-06-10 10:06 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 13:37 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 06/03/14 10:58, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
+ * Given a struct scsi_lun of: d2 04 0b 03 00 00 00 00, this function
+ * returns the integer: 0x0b03d204
+ *
+ * This encoding will
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:48 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 06/10/14 16:06, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 13:37 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 06/03/14 10:58, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
+ * Given a struct scsi_lun of: d2 04 0b 03 00 00 00 00, this function
+ *
On 06/10/14 17:01, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:48 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 06/10/14 16:06, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 13:37 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 06/03/14 10:58, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
+ * Given a struct scsi_lun of: d2 04 0b 03 00
scsilun_to_int() has an error which prevents it from generating
correct LUN numbers for 64bit values.
Also we should remove the misleading comment about portions of
the LUN being ignored; the initiator should treat the LUN as
an opaque value.
And, finally, the example given should use the correct
On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 11:01 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
scsilun_to_int() has an error which prevents it from generating
correct LUN numbers for 64bit values.
Also we should remove the misleading comment about portions of
the LUN being ignored; the initiator should treat the LUN as
an opaque
On 05/31/14 11:01, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
u64 scsilun_to_int(struct scsi_lun *scsilun)
{
- int i;
- u64 lun;
+ const unsigned char * cp;
+ uint64_t res;
- lun = 0;
- for (i = 0; i sizeof(lun); i += 2)
- lun = lun | (((scsilun-scsi_lun[i] 8) |
-
10 matches
Mail list logo
