Re: [PATCH v1] ufs: introcude UFSHCD_QUIRK_GET_VS_RESULT quirk

2016-11-09 Thread Subhash Jadavani
On 2016-11-08 22:46, Kiwoong Kim wrote: > Some UFS host controllers may not report a result of UIC command > completion properly. > In such cases, they should get the result from UIC directly if their > architectures support that. > > Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c

RE: [PATCH v1] ufs: introcude UFSHCD_QUIRK_GET_VS_RESULT quirk

2016-11-08 Thread Kiwoong Kim
> > Some UFS host controllers may not report a result of UIC command > > completion properly. > > In such cases, they should get the result from UIC directly if their > > architectures support that. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim > > --- > > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 27

Re: [PATCH v1] ufs: introcude UFSHCD_QUIRK_GET_VS_RESULT quirk

2016-11-08 Thread Subhash Jadavani
On 2016-11-07 23:48, Kiwoong Kim wrote: Some UFS host controllers may not report a result of UIC command completion properly. In such cases, they should get the result from UIC directly if their architectures support that. Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 27 +

[PATCH v1] ufs: introcude UFSHCD_QUIRK_GET_VS_RESULT quirk

2016-11-07 Thread Kiwoong Kim
Some UFS host controllers may not report a result of UIC command completion properly. In such cases, they should get the result from UIC directly if their architectures support that. Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 27 +++ drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshc