On 2016-10-06 18:16, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
Hi, Subhash.
Thanks Kim for the response.
On 2016-10-06 03:28, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
> Hi, Subhash.
>
> Some UFS host controllers may need to call the vendor specific
> callback before and after controlling by clock control framework,
> regardless of whethe
Hi, Subhash.
> Thanks Kim for the response.
>
> On 2016-10-06 03:28, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
> > Hi, Subhash.
> >
> > Some UFS host controllers may need to call the vendor specific
> > callback before and after controlling by clock control framework,
> > regardless of whether available clocks are turn
Thanks Kim for the response.
On 2016-10-06 03:28, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
Hi, Subhash.
Some UFS host controllers may need to call the vendor specific callback
before and after controlling by clock control framework,
regardless of whether available clocks are turned on or off.
Are you suggesting to
Hi, Subhash.
Some UFS host controllers may need to call the vendor specific callback
before and after controlling by clock control framework,
regardless of whether available clocks are turned on or off.
Is there any special reason to limit to invoke the callback
only when the clocks are turned on
Vendor specific setup_clocks callback may require the clocks managed
by ufshcd driver to be ON. So if the vendor specific setup_clocks callback
is called while the required clocks are turned off, it could result into
unclocked register access.
To prevent possible unclock register access, this chan
5 matches
Mail list logo
