On 02/28/13 22:00, Bart Van Assche wrote:
How about reposting these patches as a performance optimization ?
How and when do they improve performance?
With these patches I see a slightly lower latency and slightly higher
throughput. With a dm-linear mapping on top of a RAM disk (brd), a
On 02/28/13 01:42, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
Hi Bart,
On 02/27/13 23:45, Bart Van Assche wrote:
This mini-series of two patches avoids that the device mapper
implementation can trigger a use-after-free during removal of a
mapped device. The two patches in this series are:
- block: Convert
This mini-series of two patches avoids that the device mapper
implementation can trigger a use-after-free during removal of a
mapped device. The two patches in this series are:
- block: Convert blk_run_queue() recursion into iteration.
- dm: Avoid running the md queue after the last dm_put().
Hi Bart,
On 02/27/13 23:45, Bart Van Assche wrote:
This mini-series of two patches avoids that the device mapper
implementation can trigger a use-after-free during removal of a
mapped device. The two patches in this series are:
- block: Convert blk_run_queue() recursion into iteration.
- dm:
4 matches
Mail list logo