Interrupt processing can run in parallel to a remove operation. This
can lead to a condition where the interrupt handler is processing with
memory that has been freed.
To avoid processing an interrupt while memory may be yanked, check for
removal while in the interrupt handler. Bail when remov
Interrupt processing can run in parallel to a remove operation. This
can lead to a condition where the interrupt handler is processing with
memory that has been freed.
To avoid processing an interrupt while memory may be yanked, check for
removal while in the interrupt handler. Bail when remov
From: Linuxppc-dev Matthew R. Ochs
> Sent: 16 September 2015 22:28
> Interrupt processing can run in parallel to a remove operation. This
> can lead to a condition where the interrupt handler is processing with
> memory that has been freed.
>
> To avoid processing an interrupt while memory may be
On 16.9.2015 18:53, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
> Interrupt processing can run in parallel to a remove operation. This
> can lead to a condition where the interrupt handler is processing with
> memory that has been freed.
>
> To avoid processing an interrupt while memory may be yanked, check for
>
> On Sep 17, 2015, at 6:58 AM, David Laight wrote:
>
> From: Linuxppc-dev Matthew R. Ochs
>> Sent: 16 September 2015 22:28
>> Interrupt processing can run in parallel to a remove operation. This
>> can lead to a condition where the interrupt handler is processing with
>> memory that has been free
> On Sep 17, 2015, at 7:38 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>
> On 16.9.2015 18:53, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
>> Interrupt processing can run in parallel to a remove operation. This
>> can lead to a condition where the interrupt handler is processing with
>> memory that has been freed.
>>
>> To avoid process
On 17.9.2015 19:16, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
>> On Sep 17, 2015, at 7:38 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>>
>> On 16.9.2015 18:53, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
>>> Interrupt processing can run in parallel to a remove operation. This
>>> can lead to a condition where the interrupt handler is processing with
>>> mem
> On Sep 18, 2015, at 6:59 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> On 17.9.2015 19:16, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
>>> On Sep 17, 2015, at 7:38 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16.9.2015 18:53, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
Interrupt processing can run in parallel to a remove operation. This
can lead to a condi
On 19.9.2015 01:26, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
>> On Sep 18, 2015, at 6:59 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>> On 17.9.2015 19:16, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
On Sep 17, 2015, at 7:38 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 16.9.2015 18:53, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
> Interrupt processing can run in parallel to a
> On Sep 21, 2015, at 6:33 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> On 19.9.2015 01:26, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
>>> On Sep 18, 2015, at 6:59 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>>> On 17.9.2015 19:16, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2015, at 7:38 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>
> On 16.9.2015 18:53, Matthew R. Ochs
10 matches
Mail list logo