> On May 31, 2017, at 4:37 PM, Bart Van Assche
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 10:54 -0700, Himanshu Madhani wrote:
>> The reason for hard coding LUN ID to 0 is that, from the FC
>> protocol perspective, ABTS does not have any knowledge of
>> LUN ID. So, there is
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 10:54 -0700, Himanshu Madhani wrote:
> The reason for hard coding LUN ID to 0 is that, from the FC
> protocol perspective, ABTS does not have any knowledge of
> LUN ID. So, there is no reason for qla2xxx driver to
> manufacture the LUN ID.
Sorry but I think this is
From: Quinn Tran
During ABTS or Abort task, qla2xxx does a pre-search for
the se_cmd, based on command's tag. The same search is
performed by TCM. Remove the extra search from qla2xxx.
The reason for hard coding LUN ID to 0 is that, from the FC
protocol perspective, ABTS
3 matches
Mail list logo