Can I get a second review on this one from anyone?
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:34:56PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Calling the workqueue interface on uninitialized work items isn't a
good idea even if they're zeroed. It's not failing catastrophically only
through happy accidents.
, venkate...@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] virtio-scsi: avoid cancelling uninitialized work
items
Message-ID: 20140611124731.ga16...@infradead.org
In-Reply-To: 1401881699-1456-4-git-send-email-pbonz...@redhat.com
Can I get a second review on this one from anyone?
Reviewed-by: Stefan
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:34:56PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Calling the workqueue interface on uninitialized work items isn't a
good idea even if they're zeroed. It's not failing catastrophically only
through happy accidents.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com
Looks good,
Calling the workqueue interface on uninitialized work items isn't a
good idea even if they're zeroed. It's not failing catastrophically only
through happy accidents.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com
---
drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1
4 matches
Mail list logo