On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 04:29:47PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Let's please use proper static functions. The compiler can deal with
> inlining. Also, maybe ata_port_resume() and ata_port_resume_async()
> are better names for the wrappers?
So, if the suggested names don't jive well with the rest of
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 12:17:30PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> +#define ata_port_resume_sync(ap, msg) ata_port_resume_common((ap), (msg),
> false)
> +#define queue_ata_port_resume(ap, msg) ata_port_resume_common((ap), (msg),
> true)
Let's please use proper static functions. The compile
Tejun says:
"At least for libata, worrying about suspend/resume failures don't make
whole lot of sense. If suspend failed, just proceed with suspend. If
the device can't be woken up afterwards, that's that. There isn't
anything we could have done differently anyway. The same for resu
3 matches
Mail list logo