Re: [Scst-devel] [SPF:fail] Re: FC initiator performance tanks once target mode is enabled

2013-12-26 Thread Dr. Greg Wettstein
On Dec 23, 12:20pm, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" wrote: } Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] [SPF:fail] Re: FC initiator performance tanks on Hi, hope the week is going well for everyone. At the risk of wading into this controversy any further I thought it might be helpful to clarify some issues given the dyna

Re: [Scst-devel] [SPF:fail] Re: FC initiator performance tanks once target mode is enabled

2013-12-23 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 09:13 -0600, Steve Magnani wrote: > Nicholas, > > On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 10:51 -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote: > > On Dec 12, 11:45am, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" wrote: > > > We don't add interfaces into mainline drive code to support > > > out-of-tree projects, because quite

Re: [Scst-devel] [SPF:fail] Re: FC initiator performance tanks once target mode is enabled

2013-12-23 Thread Steve Magnani
Nicholas, On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 10:51 -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote: > On Dec 12, 11:45am, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" wrote: > > > What I would prefer myself is to have a single set of target drivers > > > that works for both LIO and SCST. That would not only make both projects > > > easier to main