On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 02:50:11PM +0200, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
> Not sure whether I should ack my own patch, though. But you may apply
> it to the original one, which is identical to what I did.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=139277202005675&w=2
Yes, that's what I will do.
Thanks a lot!
--
To
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 02:06:42PM +0200, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
: > any news with this patch? Will it be acked by you and submitted upstream?
: > Thanks!
:
: Give me an Acked-by and I'll pull it in.
Acked-By: Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak
Not sure whether I should ack my own pat
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 02:06:42PM +0200, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
> any news with this patch? Will it be acked by you and submitted upstream?
> Thanks!
Give me an Acked-by and I'll pull it in.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord.
Hello,
Xiangliang Yu wrote:
: > Ben Hutchings already submitted a patch for this twice, which I cc'd you
: > on:
: >
: > http://marc.info/?t=13927720393
: >
: > will you ack it?
: I can't find this mail in my mail box.
any news with this patch? Will it be acked by you and submitte
> Ben Hutchings already submitted a patch for this twice, which I cc'd you
> on:
>
> http://marc.info/?t=13927720393
>
> will you ack it?
I can't find this mail in my mail box.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vg
> Ben Hutchings already submitted a patch for this twice, which I cc'd you
> on:
>
> http://marc.info/?t=13927720393
>
> will you ack it? PCI_VDEVICE() is a sort of take it or leave it macro.
> It's not important and it will look untidy and a bit confusing having a
> mix of open coding and m
On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 18:16 -0700, Xiangliang Yu wrote:
> Hi, Jan
> I think below change may be better:
> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL_EXT, 0x9485), chip_9485 },
Ben Hutchings already submitted a patch for this twice, which I cc'd you
on:
http://marc.info/?t=13927720393
will you ack it? PCI_VDEVIC
Hi, Jan
I think below change may be better:
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL_EXT, 0x9485), chip_9485 },
> Add support for the AOC-SAS2LP-MV8 SAS-2 controller from SuperMicro.
> This controller has subdevice id 0x9485 instead of 0x9480, and apparently
> this simple patch is the only thing needed to make it wo
Add support for the AOC-SAS2LP-MV8 SAS-2 controller from SuperMicro.
This controller has subdevice id 0x9485 instead of 0x9480, and apparently
this simple patch is the only thing needed to make it work.
# lspci -vn
[...]
03:00.0 0104: 1b4b:9485 (rev 03)
Subsystem: 1b4b:9485
Flags:
9 matches
Mail list logo
