Dear James, dear all!
Am 11.06.2018 um 17:06 schrieb James Bottomley
:
> This means that somehow, something sent a non 4k aligned 4k sized
> request. SCSI here is just the messenger. However, if you apply this
> patch, it will capture the stack trace of what above it triggered this,
> which may
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:09 PM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 17:56 -0400, Bryan Gurney wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Anthony Youngman
>> wrote:
>> > On 11/06/18 16:06, James Bottomley wrote:
>> > > Well, this is the problem: a 4k logical (presumably 4k physical)
On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 17:56 -0400, Bryan Gurney wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Anthony Youngman
> wrote:
> > On 11/06/18 16:06, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > Well, this is the problem: a 4k logical (presumably 4k physical)
> > > drive cannot be addressed in block sectors that are not
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Anthony Youngman
wrote:
> On 11/06/18 16:06, James Bottomley wrote:
>> Well, this is the problem: a 4k logical (presumably 4k physical) drive
>> cannot be addressed in block sectors that are not divisible by 8. This
>> type of drive configuration is very unusual
On 11/06/18 16:06, James Bottomley wrote:
> Well, this is the problem: a 4k logical (presumably 4k physical) drive
> cannot be addressed in block sectors that are not divisible by 8. This
> type of drive configuration is very unusual (although it was something
> we tested years ago before the
On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 11:18 -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> On 2018-06-11 11:06 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 16:24 +0200, Sebastian Hegler wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > First off: sorry for cross-posting. I don't know if this is a
> > > RAID
> > > issue or a SCSI
On 2018-06-11 11:06 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 16:24 +0200, Sebastian Hegler wrote:
Dear all,
First off: sorry for cross-posting. I don't know if this is a RAID
issue or a SCSI issue, so I'll just ask y'all.
For a RAID6 capacity upgrade (higher capacity drives), we
On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 16:24 +0200, Sebastian Hegler wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> First off: sorry for cross-posting. I don't know if this is a RAID
> issue or a SCSI issue, so I'll just ask y'all.
>
>
> For a RAID6 capacity upgrade (higher capacity drives), we bought some
> 10TB disks:
>
Dear all,
First off: sorry for cross-posting. I don't know if this is a RAID issue or a
SCSI issue, so I'll just ask y'all.
For a RAID6 capacity upgrade (higher capacity drives), we bought some 10TB
disks:
==
Apr 17 11:16:05 kuiper kernel: [12795386.862031] scsi 6:0:36:0:
9 matches
Mail list logo
