Hello Eric ,
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Eric Moore wrote:
Per request from Matthew Wilcox - using PCI_VENDOR_ATTO.
Add support for ATTO UL4D, they are rebranded 53C1030.
The changes are
1. Adding a new PCI vendor ID in pci table
2. The spi_port_page_2 is in different format than that of LSI
On Saturday, August 18, 2007 12:40 AM, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c:4656: error:
`PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATTO' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c:4656: error: (Each
undeclared identifier is reported only once
Hello Eric ,
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007, Moore, Eric wrote:
On Saturday, August 18, 2007 12:40 AM, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c:4656: error:
`PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATTO' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c:4656: error: (Each
On Tuesday, August 14, 2007 4:34 AM, Prakash, Sathya wrote:
Add support for ATTO UL4D, they are rebranded 53C1030.
The changes are
1. Adding a new PCI vendor ID in pci table
2. The spi_port_page_2 is in different format than that of
LSI generic
spi_port_page_2 and hence mapping code is
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 04:03:31PM +0530, Prakash, Sathya wrote:
+++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.c
@@ -1190,6 +1190,8 @@ static struct spi_function_template
mptspi_transport_functions = {
static struct pci_device_id mptspi_pci_table[] = {
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_LSI_LOGIC,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 04:03:31PM +0530, Prakash, Sathya wrote:
2. The spi_port_page_2 is in different format than that of LSI generic
spi_port_page_2 and hence mapping code is added.
Not that we can change it anymore, but what idiot decided to do such
a change? An chance LSI could stop
On Tuesday, August 14, 2007 4:44 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Not that we can change it anymore, but what idiot decided to do such
a change? An chance LSI could stop licencees from doing such bloody
braindamaged things to the firmware in the future?
add a reminder for anyone to never but
7 matches
Mail list logo