On Monday, July 30, 2007 5:36 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> Looks good for me.
>
> Here's an updated version. Can you add your signed-off or acked-by?
>
> ---
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [PATCH] mptsas: add SAS management protocol handler
>
> This patch adds support
From: "Moore, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mptsas: add SMP passthrough support via bsg
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:10:07 -0600
> On Sunday, July 29, 2007 1:37 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > Eric, can I get your ACK on this patch?
> >
On Sunday, July 29, 2007 1:37 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > Eric, can I get your ACK on this patch?
>
> One comment on the the patch:
>
> + if (!(ioc->sas_mgmt.status & MPT_IOCTL_STATUS_COMMAND_GOOD)) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: smp response invalid!\n",
> __FUNCTION__);
> +
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mptsas: add SMP passthrough support via bsg
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:07:01 +0900
> From: "Moore, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mptsas: add SMP passthrough support via bsg
>
From: "Moore, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mptsas: add SMP passthrough support via bsg
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:24:19 -0600
> On Thursday, July 26, 2007 6:44 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >
> > Does this work for you? Sorry, I'm not
On Thursday, July 26, 2007 6:44 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> Does this work for you? Sorry, I'm not at the lab now and can't test
> it. But I can do next week.
>
> I also updated bsg's smp_rep_manufacturer to print the mpi's
> replay. You can get it from the git tree.
>
yes this will work, a
From: "Moore, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mptsas: add SMP passthrough support via bsg
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:05:32 -0600
> On Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:09 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > For smp request/response, we use:
> >
> > re
On Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:09 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> For smp request/response, we use:
>
> request -> not used
> response -> not used
> dout_xferp -> pointer to a smp request frame
> din_xferp -> pointer to a smp response frame
>
>
> So we could use response field to send vendor's uniqu
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mptsas: add SMP passthrough support via bsg
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:09:05 +0900
> Use-space applications can put four memory addresses in the bsg (sg
> v4) interface: request, response, dout_xferp, and din_xferp.
&
From: "Moore, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mptsas: add SMP passthrough support via bsg
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:32:45 -0600
> On Thursday, July 26, 2007 4:09 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > The SMP response's function resu
On Thursday, July 26, 2007 4:09 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> The SMP response's function result wasn't set correctly? bsg's
> smp_rep_manufacturer didn't check the result so it showed garbase, I
> guess.
>
> BTW, I took the code to check the result from Doug's smp_utils and put
> bsg's smp_rep_ma
From: "Moore, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mptsas: add SMP passthrough support via bsg
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:21:38 -0600
> > > > # ./sgv4-tools/smp_rep_manufacturer /sys/class/bsg/expander-0:1
> > > >
> > > >
> >
On Tuesday, July 24, 2007 6:48 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > I hadn't enabled bsg support in the linux kernel, that was
> my problem.
>
> What do you mean? You might hit the bug that you can't build scsi as a
> modular. It was fixed before rc1.
>
The issue is I'm new to BSG, and I didn't know
From: "Moore, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mptsas: add SMP passthrough support via bsg
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:22:08 -0600
> > > I'm not sure what the intent of this else case.
> >
> > This code is for an "invisible" S
From: "Moore, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mptsas: add SMP passthrough support via bsg
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:22:08 -0600
> On Monday, July 23, 2007 11:28 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> >
> > With 2.6.23-rc1 + mptsas smp patch,
On Monday, July 23, 2007 11:28 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> With 2.6.23-rc1 + mptsas smp patch, you get directories /sys/class/bsg
> like:
I hadn't enabled bsg support in the linux kernel, that was my problem.
>
> # ./sgv4-tools/smp_rep_manufacturer /sys/class/bsg/expander-0:1
>
>
> I thin
From: "Moore, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mptsas: add SMP passthrough support via bsg
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:11:34 -0600
> Tomo - do you have any documentation on how to specify a bsg device?
Sorry, I don't. But it's not difficult.
With
Tomo - do you have any documentation on how to specify a bsg device? I
was trying to run the smp_rep_manufacture from sgv4_tools, and I got
that error. Due to that, I have not able to test this patch. However,
here are some feedback with regards to the patch:
On Sunday, July 08, 2007 9:52 PM,
18 matches
Mail list logo
