On 11/10/2016 08:04 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
this really feels like a follow-up to the discussion we've had in Santa
Fe, but finally I'm able to substantiate it with some numbers.
Hello Hannes,
Since for the sequential read test the difference between the 50th
percentile sequential read com
On 11/11/2016 08:02 AM, Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linux-block-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-block-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Reinecke
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:05 AM
To: Jens Axboe ; Christoph Hellwig
Cc: SCSI
.org
> Subject: Re: Reduced latency is killing performance
>
> On 11/10/2016 09:04 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this really feels like a follow-up to the discussion we've had in
> > Santa Fe, but finally I'm able to substantiate it with some
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-block-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-block-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Reinecke
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:05 AM
> To: Jens Axboe ; Christoph Hellwig
> Cc: SCSI Mailing List ; linux-
> bl...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject:
On 11/10/2016 09:04 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Hi all,
this really feels like a follow-up to the discussion we've had in Santa
Fe, but finally I'm able to substantiate it with some numbers.
I've made a patch to enable the megaraid_sas driver for multiqueue.
While this is pretty straightforward
On 11/10/2016 09:36 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 11/10/2016 08:04 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
this really feels like a follow-up to the discussion we've had in Santa
Fe, but finally I'm able to substantiate it with some numbers.
Hi Jens,
Should I send you the notes I took on Thursday morning
On 11/10/2016 08:04 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
this really feels like a follow-up to the discussion we've had in Santa
Fe, but finally I'm able to substantiate it with some numbers.
Hi Jens,
Should I send you the notes I took on Thursday morning November 3 at 10
AM such that you can publish t
7 matches
Mail list logo