> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke writes:
Hannes> The patch "scsi: rescan VPD attributes" introduced a regression
Hannes> in which devices that don't support VPD were being scanned for
Hannes> VPD attributes anyway. This could cause issues for this parts
Hannes> and should be avoided so the chec
On 2016-04-01 08:57, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
The patch "scsi: rescan VPD attributes" introduced a regression in
which
devices that don't support VPD were being scanned for VPD attributes
anyway. This could cause issues for this parts and should be avoided
so
the check for scsi_level has been m
> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke writes:
Hannes> And in anycase, I guess we should be using the same logic sd.c
Hannes> is using. Please see the attached patch.
I'm OK with this change but please send it as a proper patch submission
so somebody else can review it.
--
Martin K. Petersen O
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 01/21/2016 07:35 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> The patch "scsi: rescan VPD attributes" introduced a regression in which
>> devices that don't support VPD were being scanned for VPD attributes
>> anyway. This could cause issues for this
On 01/21/2016 07:35 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> The patch "scsi: rescan VPD attributes" introduced a regression in which
> devices that don't support VPD were being scanned for VPD attributes
> anyway. This could cause issues for this parts and should be avoided so
> the check for scsi_level has
5 matches
Mail list logo