On 07/08/2015 05:23 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> On 7/8/2015 6:06 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>
>> We're adding extra fields here, so we need to make sure to not
>> overflow the buffer. You probably have to pass in the buffersize
>> to avoid an overflow ...
>> Yeah, I know, it's theoretical at the mo
> "Sagi" == Sagi Grimberg writes:
Sagi> Sense data handling is also done in the target stack. Hence, move
Sagi> sense handling routines to scsi_common so the target will be able
Sagi> to use them as well.
I'm OK with addressing the buffer size in a separate patch.
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Pe
On 7/8/2015 6:06 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
We're adding extra fields here, so we need to make sure to not
overflow the buffer. You probably have to pass in the buffersize
to avoid an overflow ...
Yeah, I know, it's theoretical at the moment.
But there's nothing which prevents anyone to add othe
On 07/08/2015 04:58 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Sense data handling is also done in the target stack.
> Hence, move sense handling routines to scsi_common so
> the target will be able to use them as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hel
4 matches
Mail list logo
