On 03/13/2017 11:48 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
This is assuming that we're always running on a scsi_disk, and that
scsi_disk is the only one implementing 'eh_action'.
Neither of which is necessarily true.
Ah, OK. Thanks for explaining.
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
On 03/13/2017 02:37 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> Hannes,
>
> On 03/01/2017 06:15 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
>> index f2cafae..cec439c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
>> @@
Hannes,
On 03/01/2017 06:15 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
index f2cafae..cec439c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
static int scsi_eh_try_stu(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd);
static i
On 03/02/2017 09:16 PM, Benjamin Block wrote:
> Hej Hannes,
>
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:15:15AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> The current medium access timeout counter will be increased for
>> each command, so if there are enough failed commands we'll hit
>> the medium access timeout for eve
Hej Hannes,
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:15:15AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The current medium access timeout counter will be increased for
> each command, so if there are enough failed commands we'll hit
> the medium access timeout for even a single failure.
> Fix this by making the timeout pe
On 03/02/2017 12:24 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 10:15 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
The current medium access timeout counter will be increased for
each command, so if there are enough failed commands we'll hit
the medium access timeout for even a single failure.
This sent
On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 10:15 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The current medium access timeout counter will be increased for
> each command, so if there are enough failed commands we'll hit
> the medium access timeout for even a single failure.
This sentence describes multiple failed commands as a
Hannes, thanks for posting this.
I just found time to review the description so far:
Subject: [PATCHv3 1/6] scsi_error: count medium access timeout only once per EH
run
"... to prevent false positives"
Might be nice for understanding but also makes the short log quite long.
On 03/01/2017 1
8 matches
Mail list logo
