On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:27:47PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > It works by accident, but I will veto any updates you're going to send
> > for this broken behaviour.
>
> So scsi_add_device will soon be mentioned in
> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt?
No, the will still be avai
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 12:02:15PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On 29.08.2005 10:48 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> worte:
>
> > Never use scsi_add_device with the fc_transport code.
> fc_remote_port_add
> > will do a proper lun scan if the added rport is a scsi target.
>
> Won't w
On 29.08.2005 13:03 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Won't work for all zSeries FC host adapters because they are
> > virtualized and you can have several virtual adapters using the same
> > WWPN/WWNN. Using LUN masking and zoning it is not possible to
> > configure the SA
|
| To: Andreas Herrmann/Germany/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James Bottomley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Linux SCSI |
|, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 12:02:15PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On 29.08.2005 10:48 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> worte:
>
> > Never use scsi_add_device with the fc_transport code.
> fc_remote_port_add
> > will do a proper lun scan if the added rport is a scsi target.
>
> Won't w
On 29.08.2005 10:48 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> worte:
> Never use scsi_add_device with the fc_transport code.
fc_remote_port_add
> will do a proper lun scan if the added rport is a scsi target.
Won't work for all zSeries FC host adapters because they are
virtualized and you can ha
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:38:17AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the correct sequence to register and deregister
> host/rport/scsi_devices
> at the scsi stack?
>
> ZFCP's sequence is like follows:
>
> scsi_add_host
> fc_remote_port_add (if port succesfully configured/opened i
7 matches
Mail list logo
