Re: can all 53c7xx-related stuff be removed?

2008-02-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 02:12:07PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 11:54:43AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > just an observation that, even though 53c7xx content has bee

Re: can all 53c7xx-related stuff be removed?

2008-02-09 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 02:12:07PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 11:54:43AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > just an observation that, even though 53c7xx content has been > > > officially removed, there are still a few d

Re: can all 53c7xx-related stuff be removed?

2008-02-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 11:54:43AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > just an observation that, even though 53c7xx content has been > > officially removed, there are still a few droppings hanging around the > > tree: > > Erm. It's not just a driver,

Re: can all 53c7xx-related stuff be removed?

2008-02-09 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 11:54:43AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > just an observation that, even though 53c7xx content has been > officially removed, there are still a few droppings hanging around the > tree: Erm. It's not just a driver, it's also the name of some chips. > $ grep -r 53c7xx *

can all 53c7xx-related stuff be removed?

2008-02-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
just an observation that, even though 53c7xx content has been officially removed, there are still a few droppings hanging around the tree: $ grep -r 53c7xx * arch/m68k/Makefile:# without -fno-strength-reduce the 53c7xx.c driver fails ;-( Documentation/scsi/sym53c8xx_2.txt:by the 53c7xx and 53c8