On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 08:45 +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 11:11 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 09:16 +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 23:11 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 21:49 -0400, Christoph
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 11:11 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 09:16 +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 23:11 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 21:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Currenly all non-pscsi bakcneds report
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 23:11 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 21:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Currenly all non-pscsi bakcneds report their standards version as
SPC 2 via -get_device_rev.
No, the proper on-the-wire bits to signal SPC-3 compliance are already
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 11:11:50PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 21:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Currenly all non-pscsi bakcneds report their standards version as
SPC 2 via -get_device_rev.
No, the proper on-the-wire bits to signal SPC-3 compliance are
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 10:51 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 11:11:50PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 21:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Currenly all non-pscsi bakcneds report their standards version as
SPC 2 via -get_device_rev.
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 09:16 +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 23:11 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 21:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Currenly all non-pscsi bakcneds report their standards version as
SPC 2 via -get_device_rev.
No, the
6 matches
Mail list logo
