From: Tetsuo Handa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:33:01 +0900
@@ -649,8 +660,16 @@ int sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, st
init_sync_kiocb(iocb, NULL);
iocb.private = siocb;
ret = __sock_recvmsg(iocb, sock, msg, size, flags);
- if (-EIOCBQUEUED == ret)
+
Hello.
Thank you for your comment.
David Miller wrote:
I don't think it's such a hot idea to return errors if the
wait_on_sync_kiocb() has returned success.
My patch may return errors for non-wait_on_sync_kiocb() case too.
Are you saying only wait_on_sync_kiocb() case is bad?
If so, could you
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
Hello.
This thread is from http://marc.info/?t=11834645705r=1w=2 .
I want to use tcp_wrapper-like filtering using LSM.
The appropriate way to do this would be via netfilter queuing to
userspace, as already suggested by Paul Moore.
--
James
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Isn't it better to hook into existing netfilter infrastructure somehow?
Yes, it has been suggested several times.
--
James Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
linux-security-module in
the body of a
Thank you for your comment.
I have a question regarding netfilter infrastructure.
I want to filter messages using task_struct-security.
Can the netfilter's queuing to userspace feature
get a list of struct task_struct who shares a socket
that is going to receive incoming messages?
My approach
Dear, Sir,
Thanks for your response and I'm very sorry for my late response.
Firstly, I have to introduce myself. I'm trying to promote SELinux in
Japan from 2002 (almost 5-years.). And I started up SELinux
SI/training/support business in my company from 2005.
#Also, I'm a member or LIDS
