On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 08:48 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
--- Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Andrew Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is this the sort of change that should be abstracted into the security
module API?
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 09:29 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 05:02:09PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Please correct me if any of the following assumptions is wrong:
- SELinux is currently the only user of filesystem security labels
shipped with the Linux kernel
- if a
Quoting Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Please correct me if any of the following assumptions is wrong:
- SELinux is currently the only user of filesystem security labels
shipped with the Linux kernel
- if a user has SELinux enabled he wants his filesystems to support
security labels
--- Joshua Brindle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... On the guard
implementation I'd like to note that assured pipelines are pretty hard
to get right. Without object class and create granularity (at the very
least) you might find it very difficult to control backflow. Consider
that 1) many
