On Monday 03 September 2007 9:15:27 am Tetsuo Handa wrote:
Hello.
Hi.
Paul Moore wrote:
I apologize for not recognizing your approach from our earlier discussion
on the LSM mailing list in July. Unfortunately, I have the same
objections to these changes that I did back then and from
Hello.
Thank you for your comment.
Hmm, I can't understand why I have to perform access control at enqueue time.
What I want to do is
allow process1 receive UDP packets from 10.0.0.1 port 1024
allow process2 receive UDP packets from 10.0.0.2 port 2048
when there is no guarantee that
On Sep 04, 2007, at 10:02:46, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
Hmm, I can't understand why I have to perform access control at
enqueue time.
What I want to do is
allow process1 receive UDP packets from 10.0.0.1 port 1024
allow process2 receive UDP packets from 10.0.0.2 port 2048
when there is no