Re: [TOMOYO 15/15] LSM expansion for TOMOYO Linux.

2007-09-04 Thread Paul Moore
On Monday 03 September 2007 9:15:27 am Tetsuo Handa wrote: Hello. Hi. Paul Moore wrote: I apologize for not recognizing your approach from our earlier discussion on the LSM mailing list in July. Unfortunately, I have the same objections to these changes that I did back then and from

Re: [TOMOYO 15/15] LSM expansion for TOMOYO Linux.

2007-09-04 Thread Tetsuo Handa
Hello. Thank you for your comment. Hmm, I can't understand why I have to perform access control at enqueue time. What I want to do is allow process1 receive UDP packets from 10.0.0.1 port 1024 allow process2 receive UDP packets from 10.0.0.2 port 2048 when there is no guarantee that

Re: [TOMOYO 15/15] LSM expansion for TOMOYO Linux.

2007-09-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Sep 04, 2007, at 10:02:46, Tetsuo Handa wrote: Hmm, I can't understand why I have to perform access control at enqueue time. What I want to do is allow process1 receive UDP packets from 10.0.0.1 port 1024 allow process2 receive UDP packets from 10.0.0.2 port 2048 when there is no