Hello.
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > append_function() {
> >
> > down(semaphore_for_write_protect);
> > ...
> > ptr = head;
> > while (ptr->next) ptr = ptr->next;
> > ptr->next = new_entry;
> > ...
> > up(semaphore_for_write_protect);
> >
> > }
>
> If at all possible, use struct mutex
Hello.
James Morris wrote:
> > > It seems that standard kernel list API does not have singly-linked list
> > > manipulation.
> > > I'm considering the following list manipulation API.
>
> I'm pretty sure that the singly linked list idea has been rejected a few
> times. Just use the existing AP
On Sunday 14 October 2007 11:30:53 pm Casey Schaufler wrote:
> --- "Ahmed S. Darwish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Casey,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:15:42AM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > > +
> > > +CIPSO Configuration
> > > +
> > > +It is normally unnecessary to specify the CIPSO c
This patch is a simple cleanup which should probably be
applied to -mm (assuming I haven't messed it up). The next
patch is an experimental patch which will require userspace
support and is just RFC at this point.
>From 9fc0782de6e1287aaeebe8ad653b008f09b22c11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge
>From 7dd503c612afcb86b3165602ab264e2e9493b4bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge E. Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:57:52 -0400
Subject: [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] capabilities: implement 64-bit capabilities
We are out of capabilities in the 32-bit capability fields, and
several use
