Re: [RFC PATCH] per-process securebits

Quoting Andrew G. Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Quoting Andrew G. Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): | Here is my latest per-process secure-bits patch. | | Hey Andrew, | | looks really good. Two comments inline. Thanks

Re: [PATCH 24/27] NFS: Use local caching [try #2]

Hi David- On Jan 29, 2008, at 10:25 PM, David Howells wrote: Chuck Lever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch really ought to be broken into more manageable atomic changes to make it easier to review, and to provide more fine-grained explanation and rationalization for each specific change via

[PATCH] per-process securebits

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here is the patch adding per-process secure-bits. This patch was generated over 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 + my privilege escalation bugfix. Cheers Andrew Ref: 6a63d67f37e50dd2031b3a050ebac1e64eae916e -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6

Re: [PATCH] per-process securebits

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:02:30 -0800 Andrew G. Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With filesystem capabilities it is now possible to do away with (set)uid-0 based privilege and use capabilities instead. Historically, this was first attempted with a kernel-global set of securebits. That